Sexual assault trial of 5 ex-world junior hockey players begins in London, Ont., with jury selection
Jury selection is set to begin today in the trial of five former NHL players accused of sexually assaulting a woman at a hotel in London, Ontario, after a gala celebrating Canada’s world junior hockey win in 2018. Michael McLeod, Cal Foote, Dillon Dubé, Carter Hart, and Alex Formenton are facing one count each of sexual assault and are expected to plead not guilty. McLeod also faces an additional count of being party to the offense. The trial, which is expected to last eight weeks, has garnered international interest due to the high-profile players involved.
The accused players, who all went on to play professional hockey after the 2018 incident, have each assembled their own legal teams for the court proceedings. The woman, identified as E.M. in court documents, will have the opportunity to testify and be cross-examined by the defense lawyers. The trial will be presided over by Justice Maria Carroccia, and there is a publication ban on the woman’s identity to protect her privacy.
This case has been a long and arduous process for the woman at the center of the allegations. The Supreme Court of Canada has emphasized the importance of treating complainants with respect and dignity in cases of sexual violence. Daphne Gilbert, a law professor specializing in sexual violence, highlighted the challenges the woman may face during the trial, as she will be subjected to intense cross-examination by multiple skilled defense lawyers.
The allegations against the former NHL players have prompted a reckoning within the hockey community about toxic culture and the handling of sexual assault cases. Hockey Canada has come under scrutiny for its response to the original allegations and subsequent investigation. The trial is seen as a historic moment in Canadian sport and the criminal justice system, with experts and advocates closely monitoring the proceedings.
Legal experts emphasize the importance of understanding and defining consent in cases of sexual assault. Canadian law requires ongoing and explicit consent, dispelling myths and stereotypes about consent. The trial will also be a test of how the criminal justice system responds to allegations of sexual assault, particularly in high-profile cases like this one.
Advocates for survivors of sexual violence are bracing for an increase in calls for support and assistance during the trial. Anova, a London-based agency for survivors of gender-based violence, is prepared to provide crisis support to those affected by the case. It is crucial for survivors to know that help is available, whether they are currently in crisis or dealing with historic instances of sexual violence.
As the trial unfolds, the focus will be on ensuring a fair and just legal process for all parties involved. The outcome of this case could have far-reaching implications for how sexual assault cases are handled in Canada and how survivors are supported in seeking justice.
