Trump DEI executive orders face second federal lawsuit

A coalition of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) workers, along with civil rights organizations, are taking legal action against a series of executive orders issued by President Donald Trump. These executive orders aim to restore merit-based practices in American institutions, which the plaintiffs argue will erase DEI and accessibility efforts in the U.S.
The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Maryland, challenges Trump’s \”crusade to erase\” DEI and accessibility from the country. Another lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, targeting the same DEI executive orders. The plaintiffs, represented by Democracy Forward and other advocacy groups, are seeking injunctive relief to halt any actions related to the executive orders.
The plaintiffs argue that the executive orders violate the Constitution and unlawfully terminate programs that are statutorily mandated. They claim that the orders have had a \”chilling\” effect on their First Amendment rights, preventing them from engaging in speech related to inclusivity and the history of the country.
During a hearing in Maryland federal court, the judge questioned the Justice Department lawyer about pausing the termination of DEI contracts and grants until the government’s policy is clear. The judge acknowledged the plaintiffs’ concerns about being precluded from engaging in certain types of speech due to the executive orders.
In a separate lawsuit filed in D.C. federal court, the plaintiffs allege that the executive orders violate the First and Fifth Amendments and discriminate against Black and transgender individuals. The lawsuit argues that the Trump administration is launching an assault on DEI efforts without evidence or support, harming vulnerable communities.
The plaintiffs point to the death of George Floyd in May 2020 and the subsequent protests as evidence of the administration’s efforts to quell racial justice initiatives. They argue that the emphasis on merit in the executive orders perpetuates stereotypes about underrepresented groups and provides preferences for white individuals.
White House spokesman Harrison Fields dismissed the lawsuits as part of the left’s resistance and stated that the administration is prepared to face them in court. The plaintiffs are determined to challenge the executive orders and protect DEI efforts in American institutions.
In conclusion, the legal battle over Trump’s DEI executive orders highlights the ongoing struggle to promote diversity, equity, and inclusion in the country. The plaintiffs are committed to defending their rights and fighting against discriminatory policies that undermine progress towards a more inclusive society.



