Fractious debate sees leaders trade blows over Trump, Trudeau and the cost of living

Mark Carney emerged as the front-runner in the federal election, with polls showing him leading the pack. During Thursday’s English-language debate, the other three main party leaders took aim at Carney, trying to tear him down in an effort to gain ground.

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre wasted no time going after Carney, comparing him to former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and urging voters to make a change. Poilievre accused Carney of being out of touch and not standing up for the interests of everyday Canadians. He repeatedly tried to paint Carney as a repeat of the previous Liberal government.

NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh was equally aggressive in his attacks on Carney, interrupting and challenging him throughout the debate. Singh, whose party’s support has plummeted in recent polls, sought to portray Carney as a corporate elite who would cut public services.

Bloc Québécois Leader Yves-François Blanchet also joined in the criticism, accusing Carney of being a corporate bigwig who wouldn’t prioritize Quebec’s interests.

Despite the onslaught, Carney held his own, presenting himself as the adult in the room with the experience needed to navigate Canada through turbulent times. He emphasized his ability to deliver results and steer the country through the challenges posed by U.S. President Donald Trump.

In response to accusations of being a Trudeau repeat, Carney emphasized his focus on the economy and his track record of success. He pointed to his role in breaking down internal trade barriers and his plans to address affordability issues by building more homes.

The debate was marked by combative exchanges, with Singh leading the assault on Carney and Poilievre. Poilievre, in particular, emphasized his tough-on-crime stance and commitment to pushing through oil and gas development.

Carney pushed back against Poilievre’s promises, cautioning against threats to override Canadians’ Charter rights. He emphasized the importance of balancing public safety with individual freedoms and criticized Poilievre’s approach.

The debate highlighted the stark differences between the leaders and their visions for Canada’s future. With the election drawing closer, each leader made their case to voters, hoping to sway undecided voters in their favor. As the front-runner, Carney faced intense scrutiny but maintained his composure and reiterated his commitment to delivering results for Canadians.