EPA reveals Biden sent $2B to Stacey Abrams-linked group that replaces gas stoves in low income communities
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently revealed that the Biden administration granted $2 billion to a climate group associated with Stacey Abrams, a high-profile Democrat. This allocation of funds was part of a larger scheme where just eight entities were given $20 billion of taxpayer money to distribute at their discretion.
The recipient of the $2 billion grant was Power Forward Communities, a nonprofit organization connected to Stacey Abrams. The group’s goal is to reduce the impact on the climate by replacing household appliances in lower-income communities with more eco-friendly alternatives. According to reports, Stacey Abrams played a significant role in establishing this organization.
EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin criticized the allocation of funds, calling it wasteful and dangerous. He questioned why such a large sum of money was given to an organization like Power Forward Communities, especially considering their limited revenue in previous years. Zeldin highlighted that the group was given only 21 days to distribute the $2 billion and an additional 90 days to complete a training session on budget development.
The $2 billion grant was used for the decarbonization of homes in low-income communities, funding the replacement of appliances such as water heaters, induction stoves, solar panels, EV chargers, and weatherization. Zeldin raised concerns about a potential conflict of interest involving a $5 billion payment to the former director of the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund under the Biden administration.
The revelation of this funding allocation was first reported by the Washington Free Beacon. Fox News Digital reached out to Rewiring America, Power Forward Communities, and the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund for comments on the matter.
In conclusion, the $2 billion grant to Power Forward Communities has sparked controversy and raised questions about the transparency and accountability of government spending. The EPA’s findings suggest that there may have been irregularities in the distribution of funds, signaling a need for closer scrutiny of such financial transactions.
