In ‘Hail Mary’ move ICC prosecutor files surprise application as Senate set to vote on sanctioning court

Join Fox News for access to exclusive content and special articles free of charge. By simply entering your email and clicking continue, you agree to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes a Notice of Financial Incentive. Make sure to provide a valid email address to access premium content.

Karim Khan, the controversial prosecutor for the International Criminal Court (ICC), recently filed applications for arrest warrants against Taliban senior leader Haibatullah Akhundzada and Taliban chief justice Abdul Hakim Haqqani for crimes against humanity. This move has sparked criticism from some who believe it was a strategic attempt to influence the Trump administration and Congress.

The timing of Khan’s actions coincides with the U.S. Senate’s upcoming vote on a bill to sanction the ICC over its request for arrest warrants against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former defense minister Yoav Gallant. The House bill has already passed with bipartisan support, signaling growing concerns over the ICC’s actions.

Richard Goldberg, a senior advisor at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, expressed skepticism about Khan’s motives, suggesting that the move was a desperate attempt to sway the Senate vote. He emphasized that the ICC has overstepped its boundaries by targeting Americans and Israelis, and called for consequences to be imposed.

The Illegitimate Court Counteraction Act, which is being considered by Congress, aims to sanction individuals attempting to prosecute citizens of the U.S. or its allies, including Israel. It also seeks to reclaim funds designated to the ICC and halt further contributions to the court. The U.S. is not a party to the Rome Statute, which governs the ICC.

Rebecca Hamilton, a former lawyer in the ICC’s prosecutorial division, highlighted the double standard faced by the U.S. in opposing the ICC while also criticizing its actions against the Taliban. She suggested that Khan’s announcement of arrest warrants may have been a strategic move to save his job amid mounting pressure from Congress.

Israel’s ambassador to the U.N., Danny Danon, condemned Khan’s focus on Israel, accusing the ICC of losing credibility and calling for a review of its motivations. He argued that equating Israeli leaders with terrorists like the Taliban undermines the principles of justice.

In response to inquiries about the timing of the Taliban arrest warrants and the equivalence of charges against Taliban and Israeli leaders, the ICC’s Office of the Prosecutor emphasized its commitment to seeking accountability for crimes committed in Afghanistan. The office noted that similar warrants have been issued in other conflict zones, including Ukraine, Myanmar, and the State of Palestine.

As the U.S. and its allies grapple with the implications of the ICC’s actions, lawmakers like Sen. John Fetterman have expressed support for sanctions against the court. Calls for the Trump administration to take direct action against the ICC to protect American interests and servicemembers continue to grow.

In conclusion, the unfolding developments surrounding the ICC’s actions highlight the complex intersection of international law, politics, and accountability. As debates rage on in Congress and beyond, the implications of the ICC’s decisions on global justice and diplomacy remain a topic of intense scrutiny and debate.