Jordan Chiles’ medal debacle: Everything you need to know

Gymnastics is full of twists and turns, but the unfolding saga over which gymnast will officially take home the bronze in the 2024 Olympic women’s artistic floor exercise final has been more complicated than anyone expected.

USA gymnast Jordan Chiles was stripped of her first individual Olympic medal after the Romanian gymnastics team challenged her final score. While Team USA’s appeal of that ruling was denied Monday evening, the battle for bronze is far from over.

Here’s what you need to know.

The competition was fierce – and it was always going to be close

The gymnastics women’s floor exercise final was already set to be a nail-biter before Chiles stepped onto the mat for the final performance on August 5. Romania’s Ana Bǎrbosu and her teammate, Sabrina Maneca-Voinea, were tied with a score of 13.700.

Chiles’ chance to earn her first individual medal and grace the Olympic podium would come down to a mere tenth of a point.

The 23-year-old gymnast confidently executed her floor routine to a Beyoncé medley, and all three athletes waited anxiously for the judges to announce her score.

Chiles was initially awarded a score of 13.666, placing her in fifth place. But as the stadium erupted in celebration over Brazil’s Rebeca Andrade’s gold medal, USA Gymnastics Coach Cecile Landi filed an inquiry over Chiles’ difficulty score.

Minutes later, Chiles was first to notice the judges’ decision – leaping up and down as a stunned Landi gaped at the leaderboard. The judges revised her score by 0.1, giving her 13.766 to clinch the bronze.

The win was historic – marking the first time all three positions on the Olympic podium were held by Black women. In a remarkable display of sportsmanship, Chiles suggested she and Biles playfully bow to Andrade. The move was captured in an iconic photo that instantly made sporting history.

But the celebration would be short-lived.

Romanian gymnast Ana Bǎrbosu performs during the 2024 women’s floor exercise final. (Mike Blake / Reuters via CNN Newsource)

Why Romania challenged the score

International Gymnastics Federation regulations allow a coach to challenge a difficulty score “provided that they are made verbally immediately after the publication of the score.”

According to the guidelines, a coach has 1 minute after the score is shown to make a verbal inquiry for the last gymnast in a rotation.

Because Chiles was the final gymnast to perform, her coaches were racing against the clock.

“The person designated to receive the verbal inquiry has to record the time of receiving it, either in writing or electronically, and this starts the procedure,” according to the rules.

The Romanian Gymnastics Federation and gymnasts Bǎrbosu and Maneca-Voinea filed an official challenge with the Court of Arbitration for Sport to review the circumstances surrounding the decision to revise Chiles’ score.

They argued the USA Gymnastics inquiry was filed 4 seconds after the 1-minute deadline and Chiles’ initial score of 13.666 should be upheld. All three athletes, the gymnasts argued, should be placed in third position and each awarded a medal.

For the next week, the appeals process played out behind the scenes. Both parties argued their cases before a panel at a hearing on August 10, according to the Court of Arbitration for Sport. Then, later that day, the Court of Arbitration for Sport upheld Team Romania’s challenge.

The sporting governing body announced it had determined the inquiry submitted on behalf of Chiles “was raised after the conclusion of the one-minute deadline… and is determined to be without effect.”

“The Fédération Internationale de Gymnastique shall determine the ranking of the Final of the women’s Floor exercise and assign the medal(s) in accordance with the above decision,” the Court of Arbitration for Sport said in a statement.

It was later announced the bronze would be awarded to Bǎrbosu of Romania.

A heartbroken Chiles reacts

“We are devastated,” USA Gymnastics and the US Olympic and Paralympic Committee said in a joint statement following the ruling. “The inquiry in the Difficulty Value of Jordan Chiles’ floor exercise routine was filed in good faith and, we believed, in accordance with FIG rules to ensure accurate scoring.”

It also noted Chiles had been subjected to “utterly baseless and extremely hurtful attacks on social media.”

Chiles posted four broken heart emojis to her Instagram story following the Court of Arbitration for Sport decision and announced she would be taking a break from social media. “I am taking this time and removing myself from social media for my mental health thank you,” she wrote.

Members of Team USA celebrate after winning the gold medal during the women’s artistic gymnastics team finals round at Bercy Arena at the 2024 Summer Olympics, Tuesday, July 30, 2024, in Paris, France. (Abbie Parr / AP Photo)

Another twist: USA says it has timestamped evidence

Hours later, USA Gymnastics announced it had formally submitted a letter and additional evidence to the Court of Arbitration for Sport to appeal the ruling.

The team said in a statement it had submitted timestamped video evidence showing USA Gymnastics Coach Landi submitted her inquiry “47 seconds after the score is posted, followed by a second statement 55 seconds after the score was originally posted.”

The team said it did not have access to the footage prior to the tribunal’s decision and later argued there were “critical errors” in the initial scoring and the Court of Arbitration for Sport appeals process that needed to be addressed.

“Given these circumstances, we are committed to pursuing an appeal to help Jordan Chiles receive the recognition she deserves. We remain dedicated to supporting her as an Olympic champion and will continue to work diligently to resolve this matter swiftly and fairly,” the team said in a statement.

USA Gymnastics’ appeal is denied

USA Gymnastics said the Court of Arbitration for Sport has denied its appeal for Chiles to keep her floor exercise bronze medal.

“USA Gymnastics was notified by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) on Monday that their rules do not allow for an arbitral award to be reconsidered even when conclusive new evidence is presented,” the organization said in a statement Monday evening, adding it would continue to pursue the case.

“We are deeply disappointed by the notification and will continue to pursue every possible avenue and appeal process, including to the Swiss Federal Tribunal, to ensure the just scoring, placement, and medal award for Jordan.”

The Court of Arbitration for Sport later confirmed in a statement that once both parties are notified of the tribunal’s final decision, “the case cannot be reopened at the CAS level.”

The sporting body also said both parties “had ample opportunities to present their arguments and objections” during the hearing.

“If new evidence (i.e. objectively unknown at the time of the CAS hearing) appears after the issuance of the CAS decision, it would be possible to ask the Swiss Federal Tribunal to order that the case be reopened. The CAS would also reopen the case spontaneously if all parties agree,” the statement said.

CNN has reached out to the US Olympic and Paralympic Committee for comment.

What comes next?

It’s unclear how long it could take for this appeal to work through arbitration – and it’s unclear if Chiles has already returned the medal.

And while score revisions are not uncommon, Chiles’ case is unusual. In the past, athletes have been stripped of their medals when the International Olympic Committee finds evidence of illegal substance use.

Superstar Usain Bolt was forced to return an Olympic gold medal he’d won in the 4x100m relay at the 2008 Beijing Olympics after it was revealed his teammate, Nesta Carter, had tested positive for a banned substance.

CNN’s Jacob Lev, Issy Ronald, Ben Morse, Dan Moriarty and David Close contributed to this report.