Landowners, mayors divided over coal project exploration approval in Rockies
The recent approval of coal exploration on the eastern slopes of the Rocky Mountains by the Alberta Energy Regulator (AER) has sparked a flurry of reactions from various stakeholders across southern Alberta. The decision to approve Northback Holdings’ applications to conduct a coal exploration program at the Grassy Mountain site in the Municipal District of Ranchland has reignited the long-standing debate over coal development in the region.
Supporters of the project argue that it could bring much-needed economic development to communities in the area. Crowsnest Pass Mayor Blair Painter, for example, welcomed the regulator’s decision, pointing to Northback’s promise of creating roughly 300 jobs at the site should the project move forward. He also acknowledged the environmental concerns surrounding the project, emphasizing the importance of clean water for all residents.
However, not everyone is in favor of the project. The M.D. of Ranchland, where the Grassy Mountain site is located, has long been opposed to the development. Reeve Ron Davis expressed disappointment over the AER’s decision, citing concerns over potential environmental impacts, particularly relating to selenium contamination. The federal government had previously rejected the project in 2021 due to concerns about adverse environmental effects, including selenium discharge.
Despite the AER’s assurance that the exploration program will not have significant impacts on water quality, some landowners and environmental advocates remain skeptical. Norma Dougal of the Livingstone Landowners Group raised concerns about the potential for the project to pave the way for coal mining in a critical watershed that provides drinking water to over 200,000 people. She criticized the approval of the exploration program as a mere precursor to future mining activities.
Fort Macleod Mayor Brent Feyter emphasized the importance of drilling as a necessary step in understanding the potential implications of a future mine at Grassy Mountain. He highlighted the need to balance economic considerations with environmental concerns, acknowledging the demand for coal both nationally and internationally.
As Northback’s permits are valid for five years, with the last three years allocated for reclamation work, the future of the Grassy Mountain project remains uncertain. While some stakeholders are hopeful that the project will bring economic benefits to the region, others remain wary of the potential environmental risks associated with coal development in the area. The ongoing debate underscores the complex interplay between economic development and environmental conservation in southern Alberta.
