Politics

Lich, Barber convoy trial set to resume for 1 day only

As the two-year anniversary of what became the Freedom Convoy approaches, two of the protest’s key organizers are back in court and still in legal limbo as their criminal trial continues to drag on.

Tamara Lich and Chris Barber will return to the Ottawa courthouse Thursday for the continuation of their trial that has dragged far beyond the original 16 days scheduled. The court has only set aside one day for the continuation of the trial.

Arrested Feb. 17, 2022 — a day before police started clearing the streets of protesters — Lich and Barber are charged with mischief, obstructing police, counselling others to commit mischief and intimidation for their roles in the protest.

The trial, that started Sept. 5, is meant to decide whether – and if so, how – the two should be punished for their role in the weeks-long protest that clogged the city’s core and shook residents.

Legal wrangling, technical delays, unprepared witnesses and issues over how police evidence was disclosed have all slowed the proceedings. 

Beyond the one day in January, no other court dates have been confirmed, despite prosecutors closing their case and the trial now being closer to its finish line than its start. 

At issue now is the availability of limited court dates for the trial to continue. 

Tamara Lich arrives for her trial at the Ottawa Courthouse on Sept. 11, 2023. (Justin Tang/The Canadian Press)

Accused not expected to testify

When proceedings do get going, it’s expected Lich and Barber’s defence will continue to argue prosecutors haven’t shown enough evidence to prove the two acted in a conspiracy, or committed the crimes they’re accused of.

Defence lawyers Lawrence Greenspon and Eric Granger, representing Lich, alongside Diane Magas and Marwa Younes, representing Barber, have told the court they need about five more days to mount their defence.

It’s not clear what, if any, evidence they will call and the two accused are not currently expecting to testify. Defence lawyers have argued throughout the trial Lich and Barber worked with police, city officials and stayed peaceful during their time in Ottawa.

Barber, from Swift Current, Sask., was released a day after entering custody. Lich, from Medicine Hat, Alta., spent 49 days in jail spread across two stints. The first stint was when she was initially arrested, then again after she was picked up on a Canada-wide warrant for violating her bail conditions.

The proceedings on Thursday are expected to begin with arguments over the admissibility of court transcripts from two court injunctions that ordered protesters to restrain honking air horns during the convoy.

Barber is facing an additional charge of disobeying that court order.

In a video taken from Barber’s TikTok account days after the injunction was granted and presented as evidence in court, he told truckers to “grab that horn switch” and “let it roll as long as possible” if police tried to dislodge them.

A man led toward a police vehicle by two officers.
Chris Barber, one of the organizers of the Freedom Convoy, being arrested by Ottawa police officers in downtown Ottawa on Feb. 17, 2022. (Kirk Hill/Facebook)

Crown argues case is not about political views

Justice Heather Perkins-McVey, overseeing the proceedings, is also expected to rule on whether the two accused acted in a conspiracy.

Crown prosecutors Tim Radcliffe and Siobhain Wetscher argued the case is not about Lich and Barber’s political views, but instead how they “crossed the line” in committing the crimes they’re accused of. 

They used police and resident testimony, hours of video evidence, mountains of social media content and text messages to argue the two accused had control and influence over the protests.

They also sought to establish that Lich and Barber worked together in a conspiracy to commit the crimes they are accused of, and because of this they say evidence against one should apply to both. But the defence argued this should be quashed because the Crown hadn’t adequately proven they had an “unlawful purpose” in planning the protest. 

Once the trial ends, the judge has up to six months to make her decision. A guilty finding for a mischief charge can carry a maximum penalty of 10 years in jail. 

See also  Former house Speaker Anthony Rota makes first public comments after resignation

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Back to top button