Netanyahu knocks Obama, John Kerry in first appearance at corruption trial
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu made his first appearance in court for corruption charges, where he highlighted his stark disagreements with former President Barack Obama over Iran and a Palestinian state. Netanyahu recounted his interactions with the U.S. during the early days of the Obama administration, revealing how they failed to see eye to eye on crucial issues.
According to Netanyahu, Obama viewed Iran as an opportunity rather than a threat and pushed for a return to the ’67 lines to establish a Palestinian state. This stark contrast in views led to tensions between the two leaders, with Netanyahu feeling pressured to create a Palestinian state against his beliefs. He recalled Obama demanding a construction freeze beyond the Green Line, including in neighborhoods like Gilo, which further strained their relationship.
Netanyahu also mentioned a disagreement with then-Secretary of State John Kerry, who urged Israeli forces to withdraw from Judea and Samaria. Kerry assured Netanyahu that Palestinian forces trained by the U.S. could handle security in the region, a suggestion that Netanyahu doubted would be successful in the long run. Additionally, Obama recommended that Israel take notes from U.S. policy in Afghanistan, a move that Netanyahu predicted would end in failure.
The corruption trial, stemming from a 2019 indictment for alleged breach of trust, accepting bribes, and fraud, is ongoing amidst Israel’s conflict with Hamas. Netanyahu must attend court three times a week while juggling his duties as prime minister. At 75, he is the first sitting prime minister to face criminal charges, including accepting gifts, failing to report a bribery attempt, and granting favorable media coverage in exchange for regulatory changes.
Netanyahu vehemently denied the allegations against him, claiming he is not in office for personal gain. He refuted accusations of requesting luxury items like champagne and cigars, stating that his work consumes most of his time, leaving little room for leisure. He argued that if he wanted better media coverage, he could have easily signaled support for a two-state solution, but chose not to for the benefit of the State of Israel.
Despite facing legal challenges and public scrutiny, Netanyahu remains defiant, labeling the charges as a witch hunt orchestrated by law enforcement and the media. He maintains that the real threat to democracy in Israel lies in attempts to undermine the voters’ choice through politically motivated investigations. Netanyahu’s testimony in court reflects his unwavering stance amidst mounting pressure and challenges to his leadership.
As the trial progresses, Netanyahu’s defense continues to center on his commitment to serving Israel’s interests rather than personal gain. His defiance in the face of corruption charges underscores the political turmoil and divisions within the Israeli government, setting the stage for a contentious legal battle that could shape the country’s future.
