Pennsylvania city drops sanctuary vote over federal funding threats

President Donald Trump’s tough stance on immigration has caused concern among leaders in a Democratic-majority city on the east coast. In Easton, Pennsylvania, Mayor Sal Panto Jr. and the city council decided to remove a scheduled vote on a “Welcoming City” ordinance from this month’s agenda, citing fears of repercussions from the federal government.

The ordinance would have given Easton a designation similar to Chicago’s “welcoming city” status, which is seen as a more neutral alternative to the controversial term “sanctuary city.” However, with threats of legal action and funding cuts from Attorney General Pam Bondi looming over sanctuary cities, Easton’s leaders felt it was best to avoid drawing unwanted attention.

Councilwoman Taiba Sultana, the sponsor of the ordinance, expressed disappointment at the decision, stating that values should take precedence over pragmatism. She emphasized the importance of providing essential services to all residents, including undocumented immigrants who contribute to the local economy.

Easton is not the only city in the Lehigh Valley grappling with these issues. Bethlehem also chose not to pass a similar ordinance, while Allentown enacted policies to prevent local resources from being used for federal immigration enforcement.

Despite the setback, Mayor Panto reassured residents that Easton remains a welcoming city in spirit, even without the formal designation. A GOP official in Northampton County echoed this sentiment, highlighting his family’s positive experience as legal immigrants in Easton.

The debate over “Welcoming City” ordinances reflects the larger national conversation on immigration policy and the role of local governments in shaping their communities. As cities navigate these complex issues, the need for inclusive and compassionate solutions remains paramount.