Poilievre’s ‘Santa Claus’ quip trivialized Inuit presence in Arctic, says national Inuit leader

The recent social media post by Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre regarding the appointment of an Arctic ambassador has sparked controversy and criticism from the leader of the national organization representing Inuit, Natan Obed. In his post, Poilievre questioned the necessity of the diplomatic position with a sarcastic remark, asking, “Arctic ambassador? To do diplomacy with who? Santa Claus🎅?”

Obed, who is the president of the Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami (ITK), expressed disappointment in Poilievre’s comment, stating that it trivializes the importance of diplomacy in the Arctic region. He emphasized that the Arctic is not an empty space and requires strategic diplomatic efforts with various partners. Obed highlighted the significance of diplomacy in maintaining safety and security in the Arctic, especially in light of increasing foreign interest and potential military threats.

The Conservative government, under Stephen Harper, had previously eliminated the role of Arctic ambassador in 2006. However, a new Arctic foreign policy co-developed with Inuit leaders, including Obed, aims to reinstate the diplomatic position. Obed stressed the importance of engaging with other Arctic states and allies to address issues of foreign interference and military aggression in the region.

In response to the criticism, Conservative northern affairs and Arctic sovereignty critic Bob Zimmer reiterated his party’s stance on national security and Arctic sovereignty. He criticized the Liberal government for its handling of military capabilities and economic development in the North, blaming the NDP for supporting their policies. Zimmer emphasized the need for a strong military presence in the Arctic to safeguard Canada’s sovereignty.

Obed expressed a willingness to engage in further discussions with the Conservative Party and emphasized the importance of respecting the interests of Inuit communities in the Canadian Arctic. He underscored the need for all parties to prioritize the security and well-being of Arctic residents.

Overall, the debate surrounding the appointment of an Arctic ambassador highlights the complex geopolitical dynamics at play in the region and the importance of strategic diplomacy in safeguarding Canada’s interests in the Arctic. It is crucial for political leaders to engage in meaningful dialogue and collaboration to address the challenges facing the Arctic region effectively.