Two women fleeing domestic violence sought asylum in Canada. The system treated them very differently
The journey to Canada for both Emily Owie and Deniz was filled with fear, uncertainty, and desperation. Both women faced gender-based violence in their homelands and made the difficult decision to flee with their children in search of safety and protection. However, their experiences upon arriving in Canada were starkly different.
Emily Owie, a mother of four from Nigeria, faced multiple instances of abduction, assault, and threats from her ex-partner and armed men. Despite having ample documentation to support her claims of gender-based violence, Owie was denied the opportunity to make a refugee claim in Canada due to the Safe Third Country Agreement. She and her children were instead ordered deported back to Nigeria, where their lives would be in grave danger.
On the other hand, Deniz, a mother who also fled gender-based violence in her home country, was welcomed in Canada and is now building a new life with her children. The stark difference in outcomes for these two women highlights the complexities and challenges faced by asylum seekers, especially those fleeing gender-based violence.
The data obtained through an Access to Information request revealed significant disparities in the outcomes of domestic violence claims from different countries. While asylum seekers fleeing domestic violence were most likely to come from Nigeria, they were among the least likely to have their claims accepted compared to those from countries like Iran and Turkey. This discrepancy underscores the need for a more holistic and compassionate approach to assessing refugee claims, especially those involving gender-based violence.
Experts have pointed out the hostile nature of the American asylum system towards women fleeing gender-based violence, making it even more difficult for individuals like Owie to seek protection in the U.S. The stringent requirements and narrow interpretation of gender-based persecution in the U.S. system have led to countless denials of asylum claims, leaving vulnerable individuals at risk of deportation to dangerous situations.
The case of Emily Owie and Deniz sheds light on the challenges faced by asylum seekers, particularly women and children fleeing gender-based violence. It underscores the need for a more compassionate and inclusive approach to refugee protection, one that considers the unique vulnerabilities and experiences of those seeking safety and security in Canada. As the legal battle continues for individuals like Owie, it is crucial to advocate for a more just and equitable asylum system that prioritizes the safety and well-being of all individuals seeking refuge in Canada.
