White House weighs in on leaker of preliminary assessment of Iran strikes
The recent leak of a preliminary assessment on the U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities has sparked controversy and led to calls for justice from the White House. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt has made it clear that those responsible for sharing the document will face consequences for their actions.
President Donald Trump and other leaders have asserted that the strikes successfully destroyed three Iranian nuclear sites. However, a leaked report from the Defense Intelligence Agency, published by CNN and the New York Times, contradicted this claim. The report suggested that the strikes only set back Iran’s nuclear program by several months, casting doubt on the effectiveness of the operation.
Leavitt has dismissed the early assessment as “flat-out wrong,” insisting that the strikes resulted in total obliteration of the targeted sites. She emphasized that leaking classified information is a criminal offense and that those responsible must be held accountable for their actions. The FBI is currently conducting an investigation to identify the individuals who shared the document with the media.
The White House is committed to ensuring that classified intelligence remains secure and that those with access to such information act responsibly. Leavitt stressed the importance of protecting national security and the American public from unauthorized disclosures of sensitive information.
Despite the controversy surrounding the leaked assessment, the U.S., Israel, and Iran have all confirmed that the strikes caused significant damage to the targeted nuclear sites. Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesman described the facilities as “badly damaged,” while Israel’s Atomic Energy Commission characterized the strikes as “devastating.”
President Trump has issued a warning to Iran, cautioning against any attempts to revive its nuclear program. He has made it clear that the U.S. stands ready to launch additional strikes if necessary. In a separate development, Trump called for the firing of a reporter who authored the story about the initial assessment, prompting a backlash from CNN in defense of the journalist.
In conclusion, the leaked assessment has sparked a heated debate over the effectiveness of the U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. The White House is determined to hold those responsible for the leak accountable, while reaffirming its commitment to safeguarding classified intelligence. The situation remains fluid, with ongoing investigations and differing accounts of the impact of the strikes.
