The Canadian shipyard and the British defence contractor have recently signed a collaboration contract to move forward with the navy’s new destroyers program. The federal government has largely kept the details of the multibillion-dollar program shrouded in secrecy, including the exact costs of each of the first three warships.
The agreement between Irving Shipbuilding Inc. and BAE Systems Inc. of the United Kingdom marks a significant milestone in the construction of the new destroyers, which are intended to replace the navy’s Halifax-class frigates. The implementation contract with Irving is a down payment for the first three destroyers, with an estimated cost of $22.2 billion for the procurement of 15 warships.
Despite the significant investment, the federal government has been reluctant to disclose detailed cost breakdowns for the program. The Department of National Defence and Public Services and Procurement Canada have not provided per-ship cost estimates, citing ongoing design work and the complexity of the project.
Experts believe that the secrecy surrounding the program may be influenced by past procurement challenges, such as the F-35 fighter jet saga, which led to public outrage over cost projections. The federal government’s reluctance to share cost estimates has raised concerns about transparency and accountability in the procurement process.
Alan Williams, a former head of purchasing at the Defence Department, criticized the lack of cost estimates for the warships, emphasizing the need for transparency in government spending. He highlighted the importance of informing the public about how taxpayer money is being allocated.
Despite the secrecy surrounding the program, the government announced an $8-billion down payment for the construction of the first three destroyers. However, the milestone announcement was made in a low-key manner, raising questions about the government’s communication strategy.
See also Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s tough Bronx persona is under fresh scrutiny with a resurfaced childhood nickname from her suburban upstate New York upbringing casting doubt on that publicly portrayed image. The progressive champion’s latest spat with President Donald Trump over the Iran strikes again called into question her true upbringing when she declared on X she was a “Bronx girl" to make her a point against the president. The 35-year-old congresswoman wrote in part on X: "I’m a Bronx girl. You should know that we can eat Queens boys for breakfast. Respectfully," she said, referring to the president’s upbringing in Queens as she called for his impeachment over his decision to bypass Congress in authorizing U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. Ocasio-Cortez was born in the Bronx but moved to Yorktown – which is nearly an hour outside New York City -- when she was 5 years old and went on to attend Yorktown High School where she graduated in 2007. She was considered an accomplished student there and well thought of by teacher Michael Blueglass, according to a 2018 report by local media outlet Halston Media News. “There, known by students and staff as ‘Sandy,’ she was a member of the Science Research Program taught by Michael Blueglass," the report states. “She was amazing," Blueglass said, per the report. “Aside from her winning one of the top spots and going to the [Intel International Science and Engineering Fair], she was just one of the most amazing presenters in all of the years I've been at Yorktown. Her ability to take complex information and explain it to all different levels of people was fantastic." After high school, Ocasio-Cortez attended Boston University, where she majored in economics and international relations, per the report. Ocasio-Cortez’s “Sandy" nickname — which carries a more suburban and preppy tone — appears to undercut her politically crafted image as a tough, inner-city fighter, one she has portrayed since her famous 2018 congressional campaign where she eventually ousted former 10-terms Congressman Joe Crowley. New York GOP Assemblyman Matt Slater, who now represents Yorktown, added to the scrutiny of Ocasio-Cortez’s persona in the wake of her brash with Trump and released images of Ocasio-Cortez from his high school yearbook. He claimed he and the rising Democratic star attended Yorktown High School at the same time when she was a freshman and he was a senior. "I saw the attacks on the president and her [Ocasio-Cortez] claims that she's a big, tough Bronx girl," said Slater. "To sit there and say that she’s a Bronx girl is just patently ridiculous." "Everybody in our community knows this is just a bold-face lie," said Slater on "Fox & Friends First" last week. "She grew up in Yorktown, she was on my track team." "She's lying about her background, she's lying about her upbringing," Slater claimed. Slater’s post sent social media ablaze and prompted Ocasio-Cortez to respond after an image if her family’s home was posted online. “I’m proud of how I grew up and talk about it all the time," Ocasio-Cortez wrote on X Friday responding to the post. “My mom cleaned houses and I helped. We cleaned tutors’ homes in exchange for SAT prep." “Growing up between the Bronx and Yorktown deeply shaped my views of inequality & it’s a big reason I believe the things I do today!"
Government watchdogs have also faced challenges in obtaining shipbuilding data and cost estimates for the program. The Parliamentary Budget Office has been engaged in a prolonged battle for information on the project, highlighting the difficulty in assessing the true cost of the warship procurement.
To provide context for the Canadian program, experts have pointed to cost estimates from allied countries like the U.K. and Australia, which are also building ships based on the Type 26 design. Australia estimated that each of their Hunter-class frigates would cost $4.1 billion, while the U.K. has a $6.8-billion program with an average ship cost of $1.9 billion.
Overall, the secrecy surrounding the navy’s new destroyers program has raised concerns about transparency, accountability, and public oversight. As the project progresses, stakeholders will be closely monitoring developments to ensure that taxpayer funds are being effectively and efficiently utilized in the construction of the warships.
