Liberals see a need for speed on major projects bill. Critics warn that’s risky

Liberals are pushing forward with their controversial One Canadian Economy Act, also known as Bill C-5, which has sparked criticism from various quarters. Critics argue that the legislation infringes on Indigenous rights, environmental protection, and democracy itself. The bill aims to fast-track major projects in response to the challenges posed by a disruptive Donald Trump presidency.

The proposed legislation would create a list of major nation-building projects, with a designated minister responsible for listing the projects and issuing the necessary conditions document. The bill’s criteria for inclusion on the list include strengthening Canada’s autonomy, providing economic benefits, advancing Indigenous interests, and contributing to clean growth and climate objectives.

However, concerns have been raised about the broad powers granted to the government to expedite projects without due consideration for environmental impacts or regulatory oversight. Some academics warn that the bill’s approach could lead to hasty decision-making that prioritizes economic interests over environmental protection.

Of particular concern are the so-called Henry VIII clauses included in the bill, which give the government the authority to exempt listed projects from existing laws and regulations, including those passed by Parliament. This has raised fears of unchecked power and potential abuse by future governments.

Indigenous rights advocates have also expressed reservations about the bill’s consultation process and the implications for ongoing engagement with Indigenous communities. While the government has committed to consulting with Indigenous Peoples before listing projects, concerns remain about the level of input and influence that Indigenous communities will have.

Despite the criticism, the Conservatives have indicated a willingness to support the bill, with some calling for additional changes to further expedite project approvals. However, there are calls for more scrutiny and oversight of the bill, particularly given its far-reaching implications for environmental protection, Indigenous rights, and democratic processes.

As the Liberals aim to fast-track the bill through Parliament, there are growing calls for more thorough examination and amendments to address concerns about the potential misuse of power and disregard for environmental and Indigenous rights. Green Party Leader Elizabeth May has criticized the rushed timeline for the bill’s passage, while Liberal MP Patrick Weiler has called for a shorter sunset clause to prevent future misuse of the legislation.