Moms for Liberty says Kids Off Social Media Act does not apply to YouTube Kids

access resources that may be important to their identity, such as support groups, educational materials, and more.\” However, Justice said she remains skeptical of the bill’s ability to truly protect children from harmful content, especially given the exclusion of YouTube Kids. \”I think it’s important for parents to be able to make those decisions for themselves,\” she said. \”They’re the ones who know their kids best. They’re the ones who can make those decisions based on their own family values and what they think is best for their children. And so I would just encourage parents to be involved, to be active and to really take a look at what their kids are seeing online.\” In a statement to Fox News Digital, a spokesperson for Schatz defended the bill, saying it is necessary to protect children from the harmful effects of social media. \”This bill is about protecting kids from the harms of social media. It’s about making sure that algorithms aren’t manipulating children to keep them on these platforms longer, and about ensuring that kids aren’t being bombarded with harmful content that can negatively impact their mental health and well-being,\” the spokesperson said. \”We believe that the Kids Off Social Media Act strikes the right balance between protecting children and respecting the rights of parents.\” The bill is expected to face opposition from tech companies and free speech advocates who argue that it infringes on the First Amendment rights of users. However, parental rights advocates like Justice and Parks believe that parents should have the final say in what their children are exposed to online. Ultimately, the debate over the Kids Off Social Media Act highlights the ongoing struggle to balance child safety with parental rights and free speech in the digital age. As technology continues to evolve, it is clear that these issues will only become more complex and contentious in the years to come.