Detective, last witness at Hockey Canada sex assault trial, says not adding to E.M.’s trauma was top of mind

The trial of the five former Canadian world junior hockey players accused of sexual assault in London, Ont., has been a challenging and emotional experience for all involved. Detective Lyndsey Ryan, who was in charge of the reinvestigation that led to the reopening of the case in 2022, testified about the impact on the complainant, known as E.M., when she learned the case was being reopened. The trial, which began in late April, has seen twists and turns, including technical difficulties and a mistrial, but is now nearing its conclusion.

The decision to reopen the case was made after media reports emerged that Hockey Canada had settled the lawsuit launched by E.M. This prompted London police to take a fresh look at the evidence with Detective Ryan leading the reinvestigation. E.M.’s testimony has been crucial in the trial, as she detailed the events of the night in question and the alleged sexual assault that occurred at a hotel in 2018.

Throughout the trial, supporters of E.M. have gathered outside the courthouse, highlighting the importance of addressing issues within hockey culture and continuing conversations about violence tied to sports. The case has shed light on a darker side of hockey culture that needs to be addressed and discussed openly.

The differing accounts of what happened that night have been at the center of the trial, with the accused men claiming that E.M. was the sexual aggressor and had consented to the acts that took place. E.M., on the other hand, testified that she did not consent to the sexual acts and felt scared and overwhelmed by the situation.

As the trial nears its conclusion, closing arguments will play a crucial role in presenting the evidence in a coherent and persuasive manner to Justice Maria Carroccia, who will preside over the proceedings. The defence teams will be the first to deliver their closing arguments, followed by the Crown’s closing arguments.

The trial has sparked important conversations about consent, victim blaming, and the need to address issues of sexual assault within sports culture. It is a reminder of the importance of supporting survivors of sexual violence and holding perpetrators accountable for their actions.

As the trial comes to a close, the impact of the case will continue to be felt, with lessons to be learned and conversations to be had about creating safer and more respectful environments within sports and beyond. The bravery of E.M. in coming forward and sharing her story serves as a reminder of the importance of believing survivors and seeking justice for those who have experienced sexual assault.