Dog-sitter films explicit OnlyFans content in client homes, raising privacy concerns

Amanda Joudrey LeBlanc was left in shock after discovering that explicit videos filmed in her own home were posted on an adults-only website. The videos, featuring the dog-sitter she had hired to look after her pets, showcased her bathroom floor and swimming pool as the backdrop for graphic content.

Joudrey LeBlanc, a resident of Blandford, N.S., had hired the dog-sitter on multiple occasions when she and her husband were away for the day. She described the individual as reliable and noted that her dogs were well taken care of during their absence. However, her perception of the dog-sitter changed drastically when she stumbled upon a video on social media advertising the individual’s OnlyFans account.

Upon further investigation, Joudrey LeBlanc discovered explicit videos of the dog-sitter masturbating in her bathroom and posing in her outdoor pool on the subscription-based website. Feeling violated by the invasion of her privacy, she expressed her disappointment in the situation, emphasizing that while individuals have the freedom to do as they please, she did not consent to such activities taking place in her home.

Although the animals were not featured in the explicit content, Joudrey LeBlanc found the breach of privacy unsettling. She reached out to OnlyFans, and an employee expressed willingness to investigate the matter if she filed a formal complaint. However, it remains unclear whether the dog-sitter violated any of the company’s policies.

Legal expert Wayne MacKay weighed in on the situation, highlighting the importance of privacy within one’s home. While the incident may not constitute a criminal offense, MacKay suggested potential civil liability under the tort of “intrusion into seclusion.” He emphasized that one’s home is a sacred private space that should be respected by all individuals.

Despite the distressing ordeal, Joudrey LeBlanc opted not to pursue legal action after the dog-sitter agreed to remove the videos filmed in her house from the website. However, she expressed disappointment in the dog-sitter’s initial lack of understanding and empathy towards the situation. Furthermore, she discovered that other local families had also been recommended the dog-sitter, leading to concerns about their privacy being compromised as well.

Psychology professor Lisa Dawn Hamilton emphasized the importance of consent in such situations, stressing that even if another individual is not physically present in the videos, privacy violations remain a significant concern. She compared the scenario to professional filming processes where all parties would need to consent and likely sign contractual agreements.

As incidents like this become more prevalent in the digital age, MacKay suggested that legislators in provinces like Nova Scotia should consider enacting legislation to address privacy breaches more effectively. He cautioned individuals to be vigilant about who they allow into their homes and urged caution when hiring individuals to care for their pets or property.

For Joudrey LeBlanc, the experience served as a valuable lesson in trust and vigilance. Moving forward, she vowed to be more selective about who she allows into her home and hopes that others will exercise similar caution to protect their privacy and personal space.