House Democrat’s smear of Border Patrol bill backfires after dozens of Dems support it: ‘Fearmongering’

A recent attempt by a House Democrat to criticize legislation aimed at making it a federal crime to evade law enforcement within 100 miles of the border ended up backfiring when numerous House Democrats voted in favor of the bill. The bill, known as House Resolution 35, was named after the late Border Patrol Agent Raul Gonzalez, who tragically lost his life during a pursuit in 2022.

The proposed legislation would impose penalties of up to two years in prison and fines on individuals convicted of intentionally fleeing law enforcement in a vehicle. If the pursuit results in a fatality, the offender could face life imprisonment and potential deportation if they are in the country illegally.

Oregon State Representative Janelle Bynum strongly opposed the bill, denouncing it as fearmongering disguised as officer safety. Drawing parallels to the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, Bynum argued that H.R. 35 would force local authorities to act as federal enforcers, reminiscent of a dark chapter in American history.

Despite Bynum’s objections, the bill passed by a vote of 264-155, with 50 Democrats, including some from border states, voting in favor. The legislation has now moved to the Senate, where Senator Ted Cruz of Texas is leading the charge in support of the proposal.

Representative Juan Ciscomani, a Republican from Arizona, defended the bill, emphasizing that it sends a clear message that individuals who endanger communities will face full accountability under the law. Police pursuits near the border are common as smugglers attempt to evade law enforcement, particularly in the wake of heightened border and immigration enforcement measures under the Trump administration.

Bynum, who recently entered Congress after narrowly defeating former Representative Lori Chavez-DeRemer, is expected to face a tough reelection battle in 2026. The Cook Political Report has classified her seat as “Lean Democrat,” indicating a highly competitive race ahead.

Critics of Bynum’s stance on the legislation, including National Republican Campaign Committee spokesman Ben Petersen, have accused her of prioritizing the interests of cartel terrorists over law enforcement officers. Petersen characterized Bynum’s vote as extremist and potentially endangering the safety of Oregon residents.

In conclusion, the debate over H.R. 35 highlights the complex and contentious issues surrounding border security and law enforcement. As the bill progresses through the legislative process, it is clear that differing perspectives on how best to address these challenges will continue to shape the national conversation.