Trial of Cape Breton couple accused of sex crimes involving young girl to wrap up next week

The trial of Daryl and Shelley Digout, a couple from Richmond County in Cape Breton, accused of sex crimes involving a young girl, is nearing its conclusion in Nova Scotia Supreme Court in Port Hawkesbury. Representing themselves, the Digouts have requested time from the judge to decide whether to call witnesses or testify in their defense.
The couple was initially charged with sexual assault, sexual interference, and sexual exploitation of a young girl who was under their care for spiritual training and Bible studies on weekends. The prosecution wrapped up its case after two days of testimony, with the complainant, whose identity is protected by a publication ban, sharing her experiences.
The young girl, who began staying with the Digouts at the age of nine, revealed disturbing details during her testimony. She described an incident where Daryl Digout placed his hands on her chest and prayed for larger breasts. Additionally, she claimed that she was persuaded to engage in sexual activities with the Digouts when she was 11 or 12 years old, which allegedly took place in 2020.
The defense attempted to challenge the testimonies of the girl and other witnesses, pointing out inconsistencies in the evidence and suggesting that the incidents never occurred. They also insinuated that the girl’s family harbored animosity towards the Digouts, potentially influencing the allegations.
In addition to the sexual assault charges, the Digouts are also facing charges of failure to appear after not showing up for fingerprinting following their initial arrest. They were eventually found living in the woods on their property after a public notice was issued regarding their disappearance.
The Crown has dropped the initial sexual exploitation charge, considering the age of the complainant at the time of the alleged assaults. There is a possibility of amending the charge to invitation to sexual touching, pending a decision from the judge.
This trial follows a mistrial declared in the couple’s first trial due to a conflict of interest with the presiding judge. The current trial is overseen by Judge Paul Scovil, with the Digouts expected to inform the court of their decision regarding testifying or calling witnesses next week.
The case has garnered significant attention in the community, highlighting the importance of safeguarding vulnerable individuals and ensuring justice is served in cases of sexual crimes. The outcome of the trial will have implications for both the accused and the victim, with the court tasked with determining the truth amidst conflicting testimonies and legal arguments.