Judge rules DOGE likely subject to public records requests, says department had been run in ‘unusual secrecy’

The Department of Government Efficiency, led by Elon Musk, is facing scrutiny over its transparency and compliance with the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). A federal judge ruled that the department, known as DOGE, must respond to public records requests, rejecting the Trump administration’s argument that it is exempt from FOIA.

U.S. District Judge Christopher Cooper emphasized that DOGE operates with significant independence and authority, making it subject to FOIA requests. This decision could compel DOGE to be more open about its actions, including the mass firings of federal employees and the dismantling of government agencies.

Cooper highlighted the secretive nature of DOGE’s operations, citing reports of using an external server, employees refusing to identify themselves, and communication through encrypted apps. The judge noted that DOGE has the power to reshape and eliminate federal programs, a responsibility that requires transparency and accountability.

The watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics filed a lawsuit seeking information on DOGE’s activities, prompting the judge to order the release of records on a rolling basis. This decision underscores the importance of providing timely information to the public and Congress regarding DOGE’s unprecedented authority.

While the Trump administration has argued that DOGE is part of the Executive Office of the President and not subject to FOIA, Judge Cooper’s ruling challenges this interpretation. The case is part of a larger legal battle over the transparency and accountability of government agencies.

In conclusion, the ruling on DOGE’s compliance with FOIA reflects the ongoing debate over government transparency and accountability. As the department led by Elon Musk faces increased scrutiny, the need for openness and disclosure in government operations becomes more critical. This case serves as a reminder of the importance of upholding transparency and access to information in a democratic society.