EPA chief Zeldin clashes with Senate Democrats in heated budget hearing

The Senate Environment and Public Works (EPW) Committee was the stage for a heated exchange between Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin and Democratic members on Wednesday during the annual budget request hearing. Senator Adam Schiff of California accused Zeldin of causing various types of cancer by slashing regulations at the agency, implying that Zeldin’s actions would have a detrimental impact on public health.

Schiff went on to criticize Zeldin for prioritizing tax cuts for the rich over environmental protection, alleging that the EPA’s decisions would lead to harmful outcomes. He also accused Zeldin of unlawfully terminating congressionally appropriated grants, emphasizing the potential consequences of such actions. As tensions rose, Senator Cynthia Lummis intervened to maintain order as Schiff continued to express his frustrations.

Another clash occurred between Zeldin and Senator Sheldon Whitehouse over grant reviews, with Whitehouse questioning the thoroughness of the EPA’s evaluation process. Zeldin defended the agency’s actions, asserting that they were diligently identifying waste and abuse to ensure taxpayer dollars were not being squandered. The two senators engaged in a back-and-forth exchange, highlighting the disagreement over the grant review procedures.

Despite the contentious nature of the hearing, Zeldin remained steadfast in his commitment to upholding a zero-tolerance policy towards wasteful spending. He emphasized the importance of responsible financial management and accountability within the agency, despite facing criticism from Democratic lawmakers.

In response to the developments at the hearing, Fox News Digital reached out to Senate EPW Committee Chair Shelley Moore Capito for comment, but did not receive a response at the time of publication.

Overall, the hearing underscored the deep divisions between lawmakers on environmental policy and funding priorities. As the debate continues, it remains to be seen how these clashes will impact future decisions regarding environmental regulation and resource allocation.