Poilievre’s office maintains tight control over what Conservative MPs say and do

The Conservative Party of Canada has seen a significant shift in dynamics since Pierre Poilievre took the helm as leader two years ago. While he promised to make Canada the freest country in the world during his leadership campaign, many Conservative MPs now feel less free than ever before.

Under Poilievre’s leadership, tight control has been exerted over the actions and words of caucus members. Normally outspoken Conservative MPs have closed up like oysters, hesitant to speak without the leader’s approval. They are closely watched by Conservative staffers both inside and outside of Parliament, with public reprimands being issued for any deviation from the party line.

“We’re told not to fraternize with MPs from other parties. And that’s not normal,” said a Conservative Party source. Partisanship is encouraged, and those who follow the rules are rewarded while those who do not face consequences. The leader’s office closely scrutinizes MPs’ words and actions, with partisanship being the order of the day.

Conservative MPs are expected to mirror the leader’s messaging, with catchphrases and terms coined by Poilievre being repeated by caucus members. Those who adhere to the slogans are celebrated within the caucus, while those who do not risk losing speaking time. The leader’s influence is paramount, with MPs understanding that their loyalty to him is of utmost importance.

However, some Conservative members are beginning to feel the constraints of this disciplined environment. They feel as though they are being told what to do and what to think by the leader, with little room for discussion or debate. The leader’s staff closely monitor MPs’ interactions, both within Parliament and at social events, ensuring that they adhere to the strict guidelines set by Poilievre.

Despite the iron discipline imposed by Poilievre, some MPs are starting to chafe at the restrictions placed upon them. They feel as though they are being micromanaged, with little room for personal autonomy. The leader’s tight control over the party has led to a significant shift in the dynamics within the Conservative caucus, with some members feeling demoralized by the lack of freedom.

While Poilievre’s leadership style may be effective in maintaining discipline within the caucus, it has raised concerns about the level of control exerted over elected representatives. As the Conservatives continue to lead in the polls, the true test of Poilievre’s leadership will come if there is a drop in public support. Only time will tell how sustainable this tight control over the party will be in the long run.