‘Radical’ federal judges to ‘soon learn’ consequences of bucking Trump: official
The Trump administration is facing backlash after a Bush-appointed judge blocked the administration from firing intelligence agency employees tied to DEI programs. U.S. District Judge Anthony Trenga issued a preliminary injunction, allowing the agents to appeal and stay on the federal payroll.
The lawsuit was filed by more than a dozen intelligence agents from the CIA and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence who were found to be involved in DEI programs. The employees were placed on administrative leave in January and were facing termination as part of the Trump administration’s efforts to eliminate DEI-related programs.
The employees argued that their roles in the DEI programs were temporary assignments and that poor performance was not a factor in their dismissal. The judge ruled that the government must consider their request for reassignment for open positions in accordance with their qualifications and skills before firing them.
A Trump administration spokesperson criticized the ruling, stating that denying the President his constitutionally granted authorities is a gross infringement of the law and will not stand on appeal. The administration is determined to end DEI programs and ensure government efficiency, despite facing legal challenges.
This injunction is just one of many legal battles the Trump administration is facing over its policies related to DEI. The administration has been targeted with lawsuits from various groups and individuals opposing its efforts to eliminate DEI programs.
Overall, the Trump administration is facing significant pushback from the judiciary and other legal entities as it attempts to overhaul government programs and policies related to diversity, equity, and inclusion. The outcome of these legal battles will have far-reaching implications for the administration’s agenda and the future of DEI programs within the federal government.
