The Oscars love Emilia Pérez. Why does everyone else hate it?

Emilia Pérez, a genre-defying Mexican gender-transition-crime-musical-drama, has taken the awards season by storm. After winning big at the Golden Globes, the film has now received a record-breaking 13 nominations at the Oscars, making it the most nominated foreign picture in Academy Awards history.

Despite its critical acclaim and industry recognition, Emilia Pérez has faced backlash and criticism from both Mexican audiences and film critics. Many have called out the film for its inauthentic portrayal of Mexico and Mexicans, as well as its potentially transphobic and racist undertones.

The story follows Emilia Pérez, a former cartel boss who undergoes a sex change operation and identity swap to start a new life. However, as she tries to reconnect with her family and make amends for her criminal past, she is met with skepticism and outrage from her community.

Critics have pointed out that the film was directed by a non-Mexican filmmaker, filmed on a French soundstage, and features only one Mexican actor in a major role. This lack of authenticity has been a major point of contention for many viewers.

Director Jacques Audiard has both apologized for and defended the film, suggesting that it may spark important conversations and discussions about its themes. However, critics argue that the film’s shallow portrayal of Mexican society and reliance on stereotypes do more harm than good.

While some have praised Emilia Pérez for its genre-bending style and personal story, others have condemned it for its problematic depiction of transgender issues and Mexican culture. The film’s focus on physical transformation rather than emotional depth has been particularly criticized.

Ultimately, Emilia Pérez’s success at awards shows has sparked important conversations about representation and authenticity in filmmaking. While some see it as a step forward for LGBTQ+ visibility, others view it as a missed opportunity to tell a more nuanced and respectful story. As the film continues to divide audiences, it serves as a reminder of the complexities and challenges of depicting marginalized communities on screen.