Why some Canadian towns are seeing pushes to keep crosswalks white, let certain flags fly

Residents in Westlock, Alta., and Barrhead, Alta., have voted in favor of neutrality laws that have resulted in the removal of colorful crosswalks and flags from municipal spaces. The only rainbow crosswalk in Westlock has been painted white, while four flags have been taken down from flag poles in Barrhead. Additionally, two crosswalks will be redone in Barrhead to support people with disabilities.

The push for neutrality in these towns comes after a surge in some Canadian communities advocating against decorative crosswalks and restrictions on certain flags. The Westlock Neutrality Team and Barrhead Neutrality, citizen groups in each town, spearheaded the efforts to implement neutrality bylaws. These laws aim to create a neutral and welcoming environment for all residents, free from divisive symbols or messages.

Stephanie Bakker, a spokesperson for the Westlock Neutrality Team, emphasized the importance of creating a space where everyone can feel comfortable and accepted. The move towards neutrality has gained momentum in Alberta, with similar initiatives underway in Leduc, a city south of Edmonton.

However, not everyone is in favor of these neutrality laws. Some residents, including Westlock Mayor Jon Kramer, believe that the laws will do more harm than good. Critics argue that the removal of colorful crosswalks and flags erases important symbols of identity and inclusion.

The debate over neutrality is not unique to Alberta. Similar movements have emerged in other Canadian communities, such as Minto, Ont., where residents petitioned for neutral public spaces. In response, some towns have implemented compromises, such as creating community flagpoles to accommodate a variety of flags representing different causes and identities.

Despite the intentions behind neutrality laws, some residents in Westlock and Barrhead feel marginalized and unwelcome. Members of the 2SLGBTQ+ community have expressed disappointment and concern over the removal of symbols that represent their identities. Disability advocates in Barrhead have also voiced their discontent over the removal of a crosswalk supporting people with disabilities.

The removal of flags such as the Treaty 6 flag in Barrhead has also sparked criticism, particularly from Indigenous community members who view it as a step backward in reconciliation efforts. The Confederacy of Treaty Six First Nation has condemned the removal of the flag and emphasized the importance of recognizing Indigenous sovereignty and history.

As the debate over neutrality continues to unfold in these communities, it remains a complex and divisive issue. While some advocate for a neutral and inclusive environment, others argue that the erasure of symbols and messages can have detrimental effects on marginalized groups. The conversation around neutrality laws and their impact on community identity and inclusion is likely to persist in the coming months.