What, exactly, are Alberta separatists mad about?

Threats of Alberta separation have a long history, dating back decades, but have recently gained momentum following the April election of Liberal Prime Minister Mark Carney. The separatist Alberta Prosperity Project is aiming to gather 600,000 signatures on a petition that would trigger a provincial referendum on the issue. Additionally, the Republican Party of Alberta, led by Cameron Davies, a longtime conservative operative, is intensifying its push for separation.

Davies believes that the current system, which he claims was designed to consolidate power in the East, treats the West as nothing more than a resource colony for Ottawa. Alberta Premier Danielle Smith has also emphasized sovereignty and opposition to Ottawa in her recent public statements, hinting at support for the separatist movement without outright endorsing separation.

One of the key grievances driving the separatist movement is the issue of equalization payments. These federal payments redistribute tax dollars to poorer provinces to ensure similar levels of public services. Despite being a “have” province since the mid-1960s, Alberta continues to contribute to these payments without receiving any. This disparity has fueled resentment, with some arguing that the money should remain in Alberta rather than being sent to Quebec and the Maritimes.

Another issue driving the separatist movement is the perceived underrepresentation of Alberta in Ottawa. While Alberta recently gained three seats in the House of Commons, it still holds a small percentage of seats relative to its population. In the Senate, Alberta is significantly underrepresented compared to other provinces, further fueling feelings of disenfranchisement.

Critics argue that Alberta’s anger over equalization payments and representation in Ottawa is based on misunderstandings and misrepresentations. They suggest that Alberta may not necessarily benefit from seceding, as it would have to assume responsibility for services currently provided by the federal government.

Federal regulations, particularly those affecting the oil and gas industry, are also a source of contention for separatists. Davies and others argue that federal policies, such as the carbon tax and environmental regulations, are detrimental to Alberta’s interests. However, some experts point out that federal legislation can also facilitate pipeline construction and support industry growth.

Overall, the push for Alberta separation reflects deep-seated grievances related to economic disparities, political representation, and federal regulations. While some believe that separation is the solution to these issues, others caution that it may not necessarily lead to a better outcome for the province. As the debate continues to unfold, it remains to be seen whether Alberta will ultimately pursue a path towards independence.