Canada

Survivors call on Canada to criminalize residential school denialism

Residential school survivors are calling on Canada to criminalize residential school denialism, echoing one of the findings in a report about unmarked graves and burial sites associated with the institutions.

Doug George, a survivor of the Mohawk Institute, says Canadians need to acknowledge the schools’ place in history and to ensure the children who died are not silenced.

“Canadians might be, you know, maybe feeling as though it’s been a bit overwhelming over the past few years,” George said, referencing the announcements from First Nations about their efforts to locate their missing children.

“But you can imagine what it’s like for us and our children and our communities? You can’t hide behind these things. You’ve got to come to grips with it.”

More than 150,000 Indigenous children were forced to attend residential schools, the last of which closed in 1996.

An estimated 6,000 children died in the schools, though experts say the actual number could be much higher.

Canada’s special interlocutor on unmarked graves and missing children said despite the “well-documented reality” of those deaths, some Canadians have made a concerted effort to attack the truths of survivors, Indigenous families and communities.

Kimberly Murray, who was appointed to the role in 2022, released a two-volume report this week after engagements with experts, residential school survivors and their descendants.

Murray noted that denying residential schools enforces a false view of Canadian history and protects those responsible for the system by justifying their actions.

She wrote that many people do not outright deny that residential schools existed and operated, but they misrepresent the intent, outcome and impacts of the system.

See also  U.S. 'unable to step up' on Ukraine aid, leaving Canada to fill the gap, says Freeland

“Denialism is not a simple misunderstanding of the facts; whether consciously or unconsciously, denialists are working toward the accomplishment of psychological, practical or political goals,” she wrote.

“Indian residential school denialism must be taken seriously because it puts at risk the important work of truth and reconciliation. It should not be dismissed as a harmless fringe phenomenon.”

WATCH | Report calls for 20-year probe into missing Indigenous children

Report calls for 20-year probe into missing Indigenous children

After two years of investigation, a new report is calling on the federal government to launch a 20-year Indigenous-led probe into missing residential school children, and refer their disappearances to the International Criminal Court as a crime against humanity.

She examined several examples of what she calls residential school denialism, including comments from a politician who said the good deeds of residential schools were being overshadowed by the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, a book that claimed residential schools were necessary and unmarked graves associated with them were a “moral panic” based on “wild accusations,” and a Catholic priest who told his congregation that Indigenous children enjoyed their time at the schools.

“This denialism, if unchecked, will become a significant barrier to reconciliation,” Murray wrote.

Manitoba NDP MP Leah Gazan introduced a private member’s bill last month that seeks to criminalize residential school denialism. The Liberals have not said whether they will support the legislation, which has little chance of becoming law without government endorsement.

The bill proposes that anyone who, other than in private, promotes hatred against Indigenous Peoples by “condoning, denying, downplaying or justifying the Indian residential school system in Canada or by misrepresenting facts related to it” could be subject to a maximum of two years in jail.

See also  Ribbon skirts crafted by northern Manitoba students take the stage at graduation ceremony

The bill does set out some exceptions. For example, if the statements were true, if they were relevant to public interest, if they were intended to point out hatred toward Indigenous Peoples or if it was a religious opinion, the comments would not be against the law.

NDP member of Parliament  Leah Gazan speaks as she  is joined by Special Interlocutor Kimberly Murray and Indian Residential School survivors during a press conference on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Thursday, Oct. 31, 2024. They are calling on the Government of Canada to recognize residential school denialism as inciting hate in the Criminal Code following the delivery of the final report of the Special Interlocutor for Missing Children and Unmarked Graves and Burial Sites Associated with Indian Residential Schools.
NDP member of Parliament Leah Gazan speaks as she is joined by Special Interlocutor Kimberly Murray and Indian Residential School survivors during a press conference on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Thursday, Oct. 31, 2024. (Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press)

Canada enacted a similar law in 2022 to combat Holocaust denialism, though so far no case has been successfully prosecuted under that provision.

Murray has long called for legislation like Gazan’s bill, saying in an interim report last year that denialism was increasing.

In May 2021, the Tk’emlups te Secwepemc Nation announced ground-penetrating radar had uncovered what are believed to be 215 unmarked graves at the site of the former Kamloops Indian Residential School. That made international headlines and drew the ire of people who attacked the community online.

“Some came in the middle of the night, carrying shovels; they said they wanted to ‘see for themselves’ if children are buried there,” Murray wrote in her interim report.

In her final report, Murray also suggested the government include a provision in the Online Harms Act — legislation that is still being debated in the House of Commons — to address the harms associated with residential school denialism, including missing and disappeared children and unmarked burials.

Justice Minister Arif Virani said Tuesday his government needs to review the report and the “obligations” included in it, including whether they will adopt Gazan’s bill.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Back to top button