Railways won’t have to maintain service in the event of a strike: industrial relations board

August 9, 2024

0 0 3 minutes read

Railways won’t have to maintain service in the event of a strike: industrial relations board

The Canada Industrial Relations Board (CIRB) says that CN Rail and Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CPKC) will not be expected to maintain service in the event of a a strike or lockout because rail service is not considered “essential” under the Canada Labour Code.

The roughly 9,300 employees represented by Teamsters Canada at the two railways now have a strike mandate. The CIRB has ordered a 13-day cooling off period for both sides and a strike can’t take place now before Aug. 22.

Back in May, then-labour minister Seamus O’Regan asked the CIRB to look into whether service should be maintained during a strike or lockout.

In its ruling, released Friday, the CIRB said that while what constitutes an “essential service” might seem self-evident, the Canada Labour Code’s definition is specific.

The CIRB said it had to decide whether an interruption of rail service would result in an immediate, serious threat to public health and safety under the law.

The board concluded that a work stoppage would not present an immediate threat to public safety because previous work stoppages involving the parties presented no such threat, and no party brought forward convincing evidence to the contrary.

“There is no doubt that a work stoppage at CPKC/CN would result in inconvenience, economic hardship and, possibly, as some groups and organizations have suggested, harm to Canada’s global reputation as a reliable trading partner,” the CIRB decision says.

“While such possible harm is by no means insignificant, these are not factors that are to be considered by the Board when addressing a referral under section 87.4 of the [Canadian Labour Code].”

Posting on the social media platform X, Labour Minister Steven MacKinnon said the parties involved have a responsibility to Canadians.

See also Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s tough Bronx persona is under fresh scrutiny with a resurfaced childhood nickname from her suburban upstate New York upbringing casting doubt on that publicly portrayed image. The progressive champion’s latest spat with President Donald Trump over the Iran strikes again called into question her true upbringing when she declared on X she was a “Bronx girl" to make her a point against the president. The 35-year-old congresswoman wrote in part on X: "I’m a Bronx girl. You should know that we can eat Queens boys for breakfast. Respectfully," she said, referring to the president’s upbringing in Queens as she called for his impeachment over his decision to bypass Congress in authorizing U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. Ocasio-Cortez was born in the Bronx but moved to Yorktown – which is nearly an hour outside New York City -- when she was 5 years old and went on to attend Yorktown High School where she graduated in 2007. She was considered an accomplished student there and well thought of by teacher Michael Blueglass, according to a 2018 report by local media outlet Halston Media News. “There, known by students and staff as ‘Sandy,’ she was a member of the Science Research Program taught by Michael Blueglass," the report states. “She was amazing," Blueglass said, per the report. “Aside from her winning one of the top spots and going to the [Intel International Science and Engineering Fair], she was just one of the most amazing presenters in all of the years I've been at Yorktown. Her ability to take complex information and explain it to all different levels of people was fantastic." After high school, Ocasio-Cortez attended Boston University, where she majored in economics and international relations, per the report. Ocasio-Cortez’s “Sandy" nickname — which carries a more suburban and preppy tone — appears to undercut her politically crafted image as a tough, inner-city fighter, one she has portrayed since her famous 2018 congressional campaign where she eventually ousted former 10-terms Congressman Joe Crowley. New York GOP Assemblyman Matt Slater, who now represents Yorktown, added to the scrutiny of Ocasio-Cortez’s persona in the wake of her brash with Trump and released images of Ocasio-Cortez from his high school yearbook. He claimed he and the rising Democratic star attended Yorktown High School at the same time when she was a freshman and he was a senior. "I saw the attacks on the president and her [Ocasio-Cortez] claims that she's a big, tough Bronx girl," said Slater. "To sit there and say that she’s a Bronx girl is just patently ridiculous." "Everybody in our community knows this is just a bold-face lie," said Slater on "Fox & Friends First" last week. "She grew up in Yorktown, she was on my track team." "She's lying about her background, she's lying about her upbringing," Slater claimed. Slater’s post sent social media ablaze and prompted Ocasio-Cortez to respond after an image if her family’s home was posted online. “I’m proud of how I grew up and talk about it all the time," Ocasio-Cortez wrote on X Friday responding to the post. “My mom cleaned houses and I helped. We cleaned tutors’ homes in exchange for SAT prep." “Growing up between the Bronx and Yorktown deeply shaped my views of inequality & it’s a big reason I believe the things I do today!"

“I call upon the parties to stay at the bargaining table and continue holding productive and substantive discussions that meet the needs of this moment. A negotiated agreement is the best way forward,” he wrote.

It is the government’s responsibility to ensure the health and safety of Canadians.<br><br>It is the responsibility of unions and employers to negotiate deals at the bargaining table.<br><br>My statement on today’s decision by the Canada Industrial Relations Board: <a href=”https://t.co/vZELy88DiO”>pic.twitter.com/vZELy88DiO</a>

—@stevenmackinnon

MacKinnon met with the parties on Aug. 4. At the end of that meeting, he said the parties had agreed to restart negotiations on Aug. 7, accompanied by federal mediators.

In a media statement, Teamsters Canada indicated it would provide 72 hours’ notice of any strike action.

“From the very beginning, rail workers have only ever sought a fair and equitable agreement. Unfortunately, both rail companies are demanding concessions that could tear families apart or jeopardize rail safety. Rail workers have fought for a safer and more humane industry for decades, and we will not accept moving backwards,” said Teamsters Canada Rail Conference president Paul Boucher in the statement.

CBC News has reached out to both CN Rail and CPKC for comment.

Business groups call on Trudeau to act

The Business Council of Canada released a letter calling for immediate federal intervention to stop a labour disruption on the railways. The letter was co-signed by nearly 100 business groups and industry associations, and is addressed to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, MacKinnon and Transport Minister Pablo Rodriguez.

“Rail is the backbone of the Canadian economy. Businesses of all sizes and in all sectors rely on rail to deliver goods that are essential for their operations and the employment of millions of Canadians,” Business Council of Canada president and CEO Goldy Hyder said in an emailed statement.

See also Robot with animated face designed to make customer service better

“In addition to the overall harm to the economy and jobs, a national work stoppage would also drive up prices for essential goods at a time when Canadians are facing affordability challenges.”

In their letter, the Business Council says goods worth $380 billion are shipped on Canada’s railways every year.

The Canadian Manufacturers and Exporters (CME), which also signed the Business Council letter, is calling on the House of Commons transport committee to hold an emergency meeting next week to study the impacts of a rail stoppage on the broader economy.

CME says a rail work stoppage would cost manufactures an average of $275,000 daily due to decreased output and increased expenses.