Legal experts outline who Karen Read can sue after murder acquittal

After being cleared of murder charges in her second trial, Karen Read of Massachusetts now has the opportunity to pursue legal action against various individuals and government entities involved in the case against her. Legal analysts believe that Read could potentially sue the individual officers who conducted an incomplete and inaccurate investigation, as well as the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and the Massachusetts State Police for failing to train their officers adequately.

Linda Kenney Baden, a defense attorney, mentioned that Read may have grounds for a malicious prosecution claim and could also seek damages for invasion of privacy and false arrest under the Constitution of the United States. Baden emphasized that the more individuals and entities Read sues, especially those covered by insurance, the better her chances of obtaining compensation to cover the significant legal fees she incurred during her defense.

However, Read is also facing a lawsuit from the family of the victim, John O’Keefe. The O’Keefe family may seek financial compensation from Read, which could further complicate the legal proceedings. In addition, Read could file a cross claim against the Canton bars that served her alcohol, as the jurors in her trial found that she drove while intoxicated.

David Gelman, a defense lawyer and former prosecutor, suggested that Read could target local police in Canton, state troopers, individual investigators, and potentially even the state government in her legal actions. He advised keeping an eye on the prosecutor’s office, as any involvement in misconduct could lead to further legal repercussions.

The Norfolk District Attorney’s Office brought in a special prosecutor for Read’s second trial after the lead homicide investigator was fired for sending confidential information about the case to civilians. The investigator also made disparaging remarks about Read’s medical conditions, which could be considered an invasion of privacy.

Randolph Rice, another attorney following the case, mentioned that Read could potentially sue officers or investigators for violating her constitutional rights, fabricating reports, or submitting false evidence. However, the supervising agency may deny liability by arguing that the actions were outside the scope of the investigating officer’s employment.

Overall, the legal battle for Karen Read is far from over as she explores her options for seeking justice and compensation for the ordeal she endured. With multiple potential targets for legal action, the outcome of these proceedings remains uncertain, but Read is determined to hold those responsible for her false arrest and the subsequent impact on her life accountable.