Karen Read trial forensic expert reveals evidence in red Solo cups was never tested

Join Fox News for access to exclusive content and special articles by creating an account for free. By entering your email and agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, you can unlock premium content. If you’re having trouble, click here for assistance.

During Karen Read’s murder trial, a forensic scientist from the Massachusetts State Police Crime Lab revealed crucial information. Evidence collected in red Solo cups was never tested in the death of her Boston police officer boyfriend, John O’Keefe. Testimony from O’Keefe’s niece and forensic experts shed light on the case.

Maureen Hartnett testified about finding broken glass, scratches, and blood on O’Keefe’s clothes, as well as on Read’s vehicle. She collected evidence from red Solo cups that Canton Police had gathered, but it was never tested. The red-brown substance found in the cups was not identified as blood, leaving questions unanswered.

The defense opened the door for a special prosecutor to introduce new evidence, citing a theory that Brian Higgins may have fought O’Keefe before his death. The lack of testing on the evidence from the red Solo cups raised concerns about the investigation’s thoroughness.

Despite the missteps in evidence collection, the case against Read includes charges of second-degree murder, drunk driving manslaughter, and fleeing a deadly accident in O’Keefe’s death. Prosecutors allege that Read hit O’Keefe with her Lexus SUV during a blizzard and left him to die. However, Read maintains her innocence and claims she never struck O’Keefe.

The trial continues to unfold with conflicting testimonies and evidence, highlighting the complexities of the case. Stay updated on the latest developments by signing up for the Fox True Crime newsletter. Access real-time updates and exclusive content directly from the Fox True Crime team.

In conclusion, the ongoing trial of Karen Read for the death of John O’Keefe involves intricate details and forensic evidence. The lack of testing on crucial evidence raises questions about the investigation’s thoroughness. Stay informed on the latest developments in this high-profile case by joining Fox News for exclusive access to premium content.