McMahon excoriates Harvard, telling it not to bother applying for federal grants
In a scathing letter sent to Harvard University President Alan Garber, Secretary of Education Linda McMahon criticized the Ivy League school’s handling of antisemitism on campus and advised school officials to refrain from applying for future federal grants.
McMahon emphasized the importance of American taxpayer funds and highlighted Harvard’s $53.2 billion tax-free endowment and the billions of dollars in taxpayer funds it receives annually. She described receiving such taxpayer funds as a privilege, not a right, and criticized Harvard for engaging in a systemic pattern of violating federal law.
The Secretary of Education raised questions about the origins and admissions process of Harvard students, as well as the presence of hate on campus. She called out Harvard for inviting foreign students who engage in violent behavior and show contempt for the U.S., accusing the school of making a mockery of the higher education system.
McMahon also criticized Harvard for adopting a remedial math program for undergraduates, questioning the need for such a program at a prestigious institution. She highlighted plagiarism scandals and accused Harvard of allowing racism within its ranks.
The letter also addressed Harvard’s hiring of former mayors Bill de Blasio and Lori Lightfoot to teach leadership at its School of Public Health, likening it to hiring the captain of the Titanic to teach navigation.
McMahon concluded the letter by informing Garber that Harvard should no longer seek federal grants, as none would be provided. She suggested that Harvard operate as a privately-funded institution, drawing on its substantial endowment and support from wealthy alumni.
The Trump administration’s priorities, according to McMahon, include merit-based admissions and hiring, an end to unlawful programs promoting identity stereotypes, disciplinary reform, and consistent accountability. The administration’s commitment to these reforms led to the decision to withhold federal funding from Harvard.
Harvard responded to the letter, criticizing the administration’s demands as unprecedented and improper control over the university. The school pledged to comply with the law, promote respect for viewpoint diversity, and combat antisemitism in the community.
The letter from Secretary McMahon comes on the heels of President Trump’s announcement that his administration would be revoking Harvard’s tax-exempt status. The administration’s actions are part of a broader crackdown on universities, particularly in response to anti-Israel unrest on campuses.
Harvard’s refusal to comply with the administration’s demands led to a freeze in federal funding, prompting the university to file a lawsuit against the Trump administration. The ongoing battle between Harvard and the administration underscores the tension between federal oversight and academic freedom.
As the controversy continues to unfold, the future of federal funding for Harvard remains uncertain. The implications of these actions extend beyond the university itself, raising questions about government intervention in higher education and the balance between academic autonomy and accountability.
