Risch says that USAID needs strict review of what funding is going toward

Sen. Jim Risch, Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, has called for a thorough review of spending from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) in light of the Trump administration’s efforts to overhaul the agency. USAID, previously an independent agency providing aid and development assistance to impoverished countries, has faced significant changes since President Donald Trump appointed Secretary of State Marco Rubio to oversee the organization. Concerns were raised that USAID was not adequately advancing U.S. core interests, leading to layoffs and the agency’s absorption into the State Department.

Risch emphasized the need for scrutiny of USAID spending, citing examples of questionable funding decisions, such as $3 million allocated for the “promotion of democracy in Lower Slobbovia,” a fictional underdeveloped country. He stressed the importance of strategic and effective use of funds, highlighting the need to eliminate wasteful spending and ensure that programs align with U.S. interests and values.

The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) also targeted USAID for its funding choices, including programs focused on diversity, equity, and inclusion in foreign countries. Following a six-week review, the State Department announced the cancellation of over 80% of USAID programs, resulting in the elimination of thousands of staff positions. The remaining operations and programs of USAID will be absorbed by the State Department, marking the end of its status as an independent agency.

Senator Rubio defended the restructuring of foreign assistance programs, emphasizing the need to realign them with U.S. national interests and strengthen partnerships with key allies. He highlighted the importance of maintaining essential lifesaving programs while making strategic investments that benefit both partner countries and the United States.

However, Democrats have criticized the restructuring of USAID, labeling it as “illegal” and arguing that only Congress has the authority to eliminate the agency. Representative Gregory Meeks expressed concerns about the impact of the changes on U.S. foreign policy and national security interests.

In conclusion, the ongoing review of USAID spending underscores the importance of ensuring that foreign assistance programs are effective, efficient, and aligned with U.S. priorities. The restructuring of the agency reflects broader efforts to enhance the impact of U.S. assistance programs and strengthen international partnerships.